Please wait a minute...
无标题文档
北京大学期刊网 | 作者  审稿人  编辑部       
首页本刊简介投稿须知写作与发表过刊浏览下载中心近期动态联系我们
经济科学 - 2021, Vol. 43(5): 146-160
审稿周期与论文质量*——来自SSCI经济学期刊的经验证据
Review Period and Paper Quality: Evidences from SSCI Journals in Economics

陈宸,田素华
Chen Chen, Tian Suhua

复旦大学经济学院 上海 200433
School of Economics, Fudan University

发布日期: 2021-10-14
2021, Vol. 43(5): 146-160
DOI: 10.12088/PKU.jjkx.2021.05.10


PDF
[974 KB]
109
下载
73
浏览

引用导出
0
    /   /   推荐
评审附件 (181 KB) 
摘要 本文将论文质量区分为形式质量(细致性和稳健性)和实质质量(重要性),并使用SSCI经济学期刊的论文数据研究审稿周期对论文质量的影响。实证结果表明,审稿周期变长会显著提升论文的形式质量,但会显著降低论文的实质质量;内生性检验和稳健性检验均支持以上结论。本文还将审稿周期分成多个时间区间,发现当审稿周期为半年至一年时,能够在不显著降低论文实质质量的情况下最大限度地提升形式质量。本文的研究结论对提高学术期刊论文审稿效率有重要的参考价值,有助于理解学术期刊编辑和审稿人对专业知识生产的支持作用和贡献。
关键词 论文质量审稿周期形式质量实质质量    
Abstract:This paper divides the quality of papers into two parts, namely, formal quality that reflects generality and robustness, and substantive quality that reflects the importance and contribution of the main ideas. Based on the data of papers published in Elsevier's SSCI journal of Economics from 1997 to 2019, this paper analyzes the impact of the review period on paper quality. Longer review period improves the formal quality of papers, but reduces the substantive quality, which can be supported by endogeneity tests and robustness tests. The best review period is about six months to one year, which can maximize the formal quality without significantly reducing the substantive quality. This paper contributes to understanding the supporting role of academic journal editors and reviewers in knowledge production, and gives implication for improving the efficiency of academic review.
Key wordspaper quality    review period    formal quality    substantive quality
ZTFLH:  F014.9  
1. 郭峰、李欣:《编辑部偏爱、关系稿与引用率贴水——来自中国经济学权威期刊的证据》[J],《经济学》(季刊)2017年第4期,第1237—1260页。
2. 寇宗来、韩明赫、戴嘉鑫:《研究质量与合作者技能差异的倒“U”形关系——理论和基于12家中国经济学期刊的经验证据》[J],《经济学》(季刊)2019年第3期,第771—790页。
3. 刘瑞明、赵仁杰:《匿名审稿制度推动了中国的经济学进步吗?——基于双重差分方法的研究》[J],《经济学》(季刊)2016年第1期,第173—204页。
4. 石庆玲、郭峰:《检索优势、论文标题与互联网时代的论文影响力——来自中国经济学权威期刊的证据》[J],《世界经济文汇》2017年第1期,第99—120页。
5. Beave, D. B., 2004, “Does Collaborative Research have Greater Epistemic Authority?” [J], Scientometrics, Vol. 60, No. 3: 399-408.
6. Card, D., Della Vigna, S., 2013, “Nine Facts about Top Journals in Economics” [J], Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 51, No. 1: 144-161.
7. Card, D., Della Vigna, S., 2020, “What Do Editors Maximize? Evidence from Four Economics Journals” [J], Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 102, No. 1: 195-217.
8. Conley, J. P., Crucini, M. J., Driskill, R. A., nder, A. S., 2013, “The Effects of Publication Lags on Life-cycle Research Productivity in Economics” [J], Economic Inquiry, Vol. 51, No. 2: 1251-1276.
9. Dimand, R. W., Spencer, B. J., 2009, “Trevor Swan and the Neoclassical Growth Model” [J], History of Political Economy, Vol. 41, No. Suppl_1: 107-126.
10. Ellison, G., 2002a, “Evolving Standards for Academic Publishing: A Q-R Theory” [J], Journal of Political economy, Vol. 110, No. 5: 994-1034.
11. Ellison, G., 2002b, “The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process” [J], Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 110, No. 5: 947-993.
12. Feenberg, D., Ganguli, I., Gaule, P., Gruber, J., 2017, “It's Good to Be First: Order Bias in Reading and Citing NBER Working Papers” [J], Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 99, No. 1: 32-39.
13. Frey, B. S, 2003, “Publishing as Prostitution? Choosing Between One's Own Ideas and Academic Success” [J], Public Choice, Vol. 116, No. 1-2: 205-223.
14. Gibson, J., Anderson, D. L., Tressler, J., 2017, “Citations or Journal Quality: Which is Rewarded More in the Academic Labor Market?” [J], Economic Inquiry, Vol. 55, No. 4: 1945-1965.
15. Hadavand, A., Hamermesh, D. S., Wilson, W. W., 2021, “Publishing Economics: How Slow? Why Slow? Is Slow Productive? Fixing Slow?” [D], National Bureau of Economic Research.
16. Hamermesh, D. S., 2013, “Six Decades of Top Economics Publishing: Who and How?” [J], Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 51, No. 1: 162-172.
17. Hamermesh, D. S., 2018, “Citations in Economics: Measurement, Uses, and Impacts” [J], Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 56, No. 1:115-156.
18. Head, K., Li, Y. A., Minondo, A., 2019, “Geography, Ties, and Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Citations in Mathematics” [J], Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 101, No. 4: 713-727.
19. Huisman, J., Smits, J., 2017, “Duration and Quality of the Peer Review Process: The Author's Perspective” [J], Scientometrics, Vol. 113, No. 1: 633-650.
20. Laband, D. N., Piette, M. J., 1994, “Favoritism versus Search for Good Papers: Empirical Evidence Regarding the Behavior of Journal Editors” [J], Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 102, No. 1: 194-203.
21. Lehmann, D. R., McAlister, L., Staelin, R., 2011, “Sophistication in Research in Marketing” [J], Journal of Marketing, Vol. 75, No, 4: 155-165.
22. Liebowitz, S. J., Palmer, J. P., 1984, “Assessing the Relative Impacts of Economics Journals” [J], Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 22, No. 1: 77-88.
23. Liebowitz, S., 2013, “Our Uneconomic Methods of Measuring Economic Research” [J], Voxeu, Vol. 1: 99-104.
24. Lusher, L. R., Yang, W., Carrell, S. E., 2021, “Congestion on the Information Superhighway: Does Economics Have a Working Papers Problem?” [D], National Bureau of Economic Research.
25. Moed, H. F., Burger, W. J. M., Frankfort, J. G., Van Raan, A. F. J., 1985, “The Use of Bibliometric Data for the Measurement of University Research Performance” [J], Research Policy, Vol. 14, No. 3: 131-149.
26. Pinzon, E., 2015, Thirty Years with Stata: A Retrospective [M], College Station, TX: Stata Press.
27. Powdthavee, N., Riyanto, Y. E., Knetsch, J. L., 2018, “Lower-rated Publications do Lower Academics' Judgments of Publication Lists: Evidence from a Survey Experiment of Economists” [J], Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 66: 33-44.
28. Rust, R. T., 2018, “Editorial: Reflections on the Review Process” [J], International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 35: 533-535.
29. Taylor, J., 2011,. “The Assessment of Research Quality in UK Universities: Peer Review or Metrics?” [J], British Journal of Management, Vol. 22, No. 2: 202-217.
30. Vinkler, P., 1987, “A Quasi-quantitative Citation Model” [J], Scientometrics, Vol. 12, No. 1-2: 47-72.
31. Welch, I., 2014, “Referee Recommendations” [J], The Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 27, No. 9: 2773-2804.
32. White, H. D., 2001, “Authors as Citers over Time” [J], Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 52, No. 2: 87-108.
33. Yue, W., Wilson, C. S., 2004, “Measuring the Citation Impact of Research Journals in Clinical Neurology: A Structural Equation Modelling Analysis” [J], Scientometrics, Vol. 60, No. 3: 317-332.
[1] 附录与扩展 Download
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Discussed   
首页 · 关于 · 关于OA · 法律公告 · 收录须知 · 联系我们

© 2015-2017 北京大学图书馆 .